[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2E89032DDAA8B9408CB92943514A0337AB52874E@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:23:15 +0000
From: "Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
"Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Support Opensource" <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/7] mfd: Add support for DA9150 combined charger &
fuel-gauge device
On January 19, 2015 11:34, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Adam Thomson wrote:
>
> > DA9150 is a combined Charger and Fuel-Gauge IC, with additional
> > GPIO and GPADC functionality.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 12 +
> > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/mfd/da9150-core.c | 413 ++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mfd/da9150/core.h | 68 ++
> > include/linux/mfd/da9150/registers.h | 1155
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 1649 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/da9150-core.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/da9150/core.h
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/da9150/registers.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > index 2e6b731..56e80d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > @@ -195,6 +195,18 @@ config MFD_DA9063
> > Additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality
> > of the device.
> >
> > +config MFD_DA9150
> > + tristate "Dialog Semiconductor DA9150 Charger Fuel-Gauge chip"
> > + depends on I2C=y
> > + select MFD_CORE
> > + select REGMAP_I2C
> > + select REGMAP_IRQ
> > + help
> > + This adds support for the DA9150 integrated charger and fuel-gauge
> > + chip. This driver provides common support for accessing the device.
> > + Additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the specific
> > + features of the device.
> > +
> > config MFD_DLN2
> > tristate "Diolan DLN2 support"
> > select MFD_CORE
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > index 53467e2..f06f4c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_DA9055) += da9055.o
> >
> > da9063-objs := da9063-core.o da9063-irq.o da9063-i2c.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_DA9063) += da9063.o
> > -
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_DA9150) += da9150-core.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MAX14577) += max14577.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MAX77686) += max77686.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MAX77693) += max77693.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9150-core.c b/drivers/mfd/da9150-core.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..4d757b9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9150-core.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,413 @@
> > +/*
> > + * DA9150 Core MFD Driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2014 Dialog Semiconductor
> > + *
> > + * Author: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> > + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
> > + * option) any later version.
> > + */
>
> [...]
>
> > +u8 da9150_reg_read(struct da9150 *da9150, u16 reg)
> > +{
> > + int val, ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(da9150->regmap, reg, &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(da9150->dev, "Failed to read from reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> > + reg, ret);
> > +
> > + return (u8) val;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(da9150_reg_read);
> > +
> > +void da9150_reg_write(struct da9150 *da9150, u16 reg, u8 val)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_write(da9150->regmap, reg, val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(da9150->dev, "Failed to write to reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> > + reg, ret);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(da9150_reg_write);
> > +
> > +void da9150_set_bits(struct da9150 *da9150, u16 reg, u8 mask, u8 val)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(da9150->regmap, reg, mask, val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(da9150->dev, "Failed to set bits in reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> > + reg, ret);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(da9150_set_bits);
> > +
> > +void da9150_bulk_read(struct da9150 *da9150, u16 reg, int count, u8 *buf)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_bulk_read(da9150->regmap, reg, buf, count);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(da9150->dev, "Failed to bulk read from reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> > + reg, ret);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(da9150_bulk_read);
> > +
> > +void da9150_bulk_write(struct da9150 *da9150, u16 reg, int count, const u8
> *buf)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_raw_write(da9150->regmap, reg, buf, count);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(da9150->dev, "Failed to bulk write to reg 0x%x %d\n",
> > + reg, ret);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(da9150_bulk_write);
>
> I've never been a fan of this type of aggregation. Can you explain to
> me what the point of them is?
I refer you back to our previous discussion some time back:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/9/284
'The reason for these is because future patches to add additional functionality
will introduce I2C access functions which do not use regmap and access the
device via a separate I2C address for this purpose. I will need to provide
access functions for that, and so having a common style of I2C access makes
sense for this driver. Means any access just needs to provide the MFD private
data, and the relevant functions take care of the rest. I think this is cleaner
in this instance.'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists