lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54BD138D.3090403@citrix.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:24:13 +0000
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
CC:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugfix 3/3] x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI IRQ resources

On 19/01/15 04:55, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Some PCI device drivers assume that pci_dev->irq won't change after
> calling pci_disable_device() and pci_enable_device() during suspend and
> resume.
> 
> Commit c03b3b0738a56cf283b0d05256988d5e3c8bd719 ("x86, irq, mpparse:
> Release IOAPIC pin when PCI device is disabled") frees PCI IRQ
> resources when pci_disable_device() is called and reallocate IRQ
> resources when pci_enable_device() is called again. This breaks
> above assumption. So commit 3eec595235c1 ("x86, irq, PCI: Keep IRQ
> assignment for PCI devices during suspend/hibernation") and
> 9eabc99a635a ("x86, irq, PCI: Keep IRQ assignment for runtime power
> management") fix the issue by avoiding freeing/reallocating IRQ
> resources during PCI device suspend/resume. They achieve this by
> checking dev.power.is_prepared and dev.power.runtime_status.
> PM maintainer, Rafael, then pointed out that it's really an ugly fix
> which leaking PM internal state information to IRQ subsystem.

If this only affects pciback, perhaps it would be best to just fix it there?

> Recently David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> also reports an
> regression in pciback driver caused by commit cffe0a2b5a34 ("x86, irq:
> Keep balance of IOAPIC pin reference count"). Please refer to:

Sander reported this regression.

> So this patch refine the way to release PCI IRQ resources. Instead of
> releasing PCI IRQ resources in pci_disable_device()/
> pcibios_disable_device(), we now release it at driver unbinding
> notification BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER. In other word, we only release
> PCI IRQ resources when there's no driver bound to the PCI device, and
> it keeps the assumption that pci_dev->irq won't through multiple
> invocation of pci_enable_device()/pci_disable_device().

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ