[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54BC71BD.2030202@realsil.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 02:53:49 +0000
From: 敬锐 <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"rogerable@...ltek.com" <rogerable@...ltek.com>,
王炜 <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] mfd: rtsx: add support for rts525A
On 01/18/2015 07:13 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void rts5249_force_power_down(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, u8 pm_state)
>> > rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, AUTOLOAD_CFG_BASE + 3, 0x01, 0);
>> >
>> > if (pm_state == HOST_ENTER_S3) {
>> >- if (PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x524A)
>> >+ if (PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x524A || PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x525A)
> Shouldn't these be defined somewhere?
>
> I have a particular distaste for magic numbers.
>
This is the chip ID number, no need define, just using it.
if we define, it will like RTS525A_PCI_ID, so bad.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists