[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54BD3E3E.2040801@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:26:22 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
CC: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra20: Store CPU "resettable" status in IRAM
On 01/19/2015 07:12 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:58:57PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Commit 7232398abc6a ("ARM: tegra: Convert PMC to a driver") changed tegra_resume()
>> location storing from late to early and, as a result, broke suspend on Tegra20.
>> PMC scratch register 41 is used by tegra LP1 resume code for retrieving stored
>> physical memory address of common resume function and in the same time used by
>> tegra20_cpu_shutdown() (shared by Tegra20 cpuidle driver and platform SMP code),
>> which is storing CPU1 "resettable" status. It implies strict order of scratch
>> register usage, otherwise resume function address is lost on Tegra20 after
>> disabling non-boot CPU's on suspend. Fix it by storing "resettable" status in
>> IRAM instead of PMC scratch register.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> Fixes: 7232398abc6a (ARM: tegra: Convert PMC to a driver)
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.17+
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle-tegra20.c | 5 ++---
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset-handler.S | 10 +++++++---
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.h | 4 ++++
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra20.S | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep.h | 4 ++++
>> 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> I'm leaning towards applying this. Stephen, Alex, Peter: any objections?
Hopefully this works out. I suppose it's unlikely anyone will be running
code on the AVP upstrem, so any potential conflict with AVP's usage of
IRAM isn't likely to occur.
__tegra20_cpu1_resettable_status_offset has a lot of _ at the start.
Should the symbol be named more normally? I guess at least it's
consistent with the existing very "underscory"
__tegra_cpu_reset_handler_start.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists