[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54BD42D0.3020107@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:45:52 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra20: Store CPU "resettable" status in IRAM
On 01/19/2015 10:41 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 19.01.2015 20:26, Stephen Warren пишет:
>> Hopefully this works out. I suppose it's unlikely anyone will be
>> running code on
>> the AVP upstrem, so any potential conflict with AVP's usage of IRAM
>> isn't likely
>> to occur.
>>
> I don't see how it can conflict with AVP code. First KB of IRAM is
> reserved for reset handler. Am I missing something?
>
> From reset.h:
>
> /* The first 1K of IRAM is permanently reserved for the CPU reset
> handler */
I believe "CPU" in that context means AVP CPU. Still, I may not be
correct, and to be honest it's likely not too well defined even if that
comment seems clear-cut.
>> __tegra20_cpu1_resettable_status_offset has a lot of _ at the start.
>> Should the
>> symbol be named more normally? I guess at least it's consistent with the
>> existing very "underscory" __tegra_cpu_reset_handler_start.
> I also wasn't happy with "underscory" :) And yes, I left it for
> consistency. Please feel free to rename it, if needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists