linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150119143024.5b8a20bc@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:30:24 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>,
	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

Hi Marcel,

On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:13:17 -0800 Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org> wrote:
>
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > In file included from net/bridge/br.c:22:0:
> > include/net/switchdev.h:73:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
> > {
> > ^
> > include/net/switchdev.h:71:19: warning: 'call_netdev_switch_notifiers' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]
> > static inline int call_netdev_switch_notifiers(unsigned long val, struct net_device *dev,
> >                   ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit 03bf0c281234 ("switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier").
> > 
> > I have used the net-next tree from next-20150116 for today.  I also had
> > to use the bluetooth tree from next-20150116 as it was fast forwarded
> > to be the same as the net-next tree today.
> 
> it seems Dave forgot to push out his net-next tree, but in theory it should contain a fix for it.

Or he did so after I fetched his tree this morning.  Either way, I
assume it will be fixed tomorrow.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped