lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1421642980-10045-5-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:49:40 +0000
From:	Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@...aro.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
	Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] sched/rt: Optimize find_lowest_rq() to select a cache hot cpu

In find_lowest_rq(), if we can't find a wake_affine cpu from
sched_domain, then we can actually determine a cache hot cpu
instead of simply calling "cpumask_any(lowest_mask)" which
always returns the first cpu in the mask.

So, we can determine the cache hot cpu during the interation of
sched_domain() in passing.

Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@...aro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/rt.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index d28cfa4..e6a42e6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1535,6 +1535,7 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
 	struct cpumask *lowest_mask = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask);
 	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	int cpu      = task_cpu(task);
+	int cachehot_cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
 
 	/* Make sure the mask is initialized first */
 	if (unlikely(!lowest_mask))
@@ -1566,8 +1567,12 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
+		if (cachehot_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+			cachehot_cpu = cpumask_first_and(lowest_mask,
+						   sched_domain_span(sd));
+
 		if (sd->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) {
-			int best_cpu;
+			int wakeaffine_cpu;
 
 			/*
 			 * "this_cpu" is cheaper to preempt than a
@@ -1579,16 +1584,20 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
 				return this_cpu;
 			}
 
-			best_cpu = cpumask_first_and(lowest_mask,
+			wakeaffine_cpu = cpumask_first_and(lowest_mask,
 						     sched_domain_span(sd));
-			if (best_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
+			if (wakeaffine_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
 				rcu_read_unlock();
-				return best_cpu;
+				return wakeaffine_cpu;
 			}
 		}
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
+	/* most likely cache-hot */
+	if (cachehot_cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+		return cachehot_cpu;
+
 	/*
 	 * And finally, if there were no matches within the domains
 	 * just give the caller *something* to work with from the compatible
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ