linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs: Only accept read/write permissions for file attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150120195157.GA10864@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:51:57 +0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs: Only accept read/write permissions for file
 attributes

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 09:13:12AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:44:01AM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> > 
> [ ... ]
> > 
> > > Anyway, my goal was to keep things simple. Taking some bits from the default
> > > and others from the return value of the is_visible function isn't simple,
> > > even more so since your code would require the is_visible function to mask
> > > out SYSFS_PREALLOC to avoid the warning.
> > 
> > While I'm still not sure about the consequences of flipping this SYSFS_PREALLOC
> > bit at runtime, I do agree with your goal.
> > 
> > Then to keep it simple, the scope of is_visible could be limited to any bit
> > allowed at attribute declaration (using *_ATTR* macros). The compile-time check
> > macro VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS() allows any bit but S_IWOTH. The scope can be
> > SYSFS_PREALLOC | 0775. (or 0664 if we want to avoid executables as well.)
> > 
> > [ This will prevent some follow-up patches "avoid world-writable sysfs files".
> > In the future, we may want a runtime equivalent of VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS. ]
> > 
> 0775 and 0664 are both fine with me, with a preference for 0664. Before I
> resubmit - Greg, any preference from your side ?

I don't have the time to look at them this week, so feel free to fix up
what you know about and resend and I will get to them as soon as I can.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/