linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: set kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable re-optimization.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54BDFFCD.4010500@hitachi.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:12:13 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	tixy@...aro.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: set kprobes_all_disarmed earlier
 to enable re-optimization.

(2015/01/20 12:02), Wang Nan wrote:
> On 2015/1/12 19:24, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2015/01/05 21:31), Wang Nan wrote:
>>> In original code, the probed instruction doesn't get optimized after
>>>
>>> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>>> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>>>
>>> This is because original code checks kprobes_all_disarmed in
>>> optimize_kprobe(), but this flag is turned off after calling that
>>> function. Therefore, optimize_kprobe() will see
>>> kprobes_all_disarmed == true and doesn't do the optimization.
>>
>> OK, a workaround is to disable/enable optimizing via sysctl.
>>
>>>
>>> This patch simply turns off kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable
>>> optimization.
>>>
>>
>> Anyway, thank you for finding that! :)
>>
>> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
>>
> 
> Hi Masami Hiramatsu,
> 
> What about this patch? Are you still thinking on it like
> '[PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: checks kprobes_all_disarmed in unoptimized_kprobe()' ?

Without this patch.
-----
[root@...alhost tracing]# echo p do_fork+5 > kprobe_events
[root@...alhost tracing]# echo 1 > events/kprobes/p_do_fork_5/enable
[root@...alhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bd055  k  do_fork+0x5    [OPTIMIZED]
[root@...alhost tracing]# echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
[root@...alhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bd055  k  do_fork+0x5
[root@...alhost tracing]# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
[root@...alhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bd055  k  do_fork+0x5
------
With this patch.
------
[root@...alhost tracing]# echo p do_fork+5 > kprobe_events
[root@...alhost tracing]# echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable
[root@...alhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bc1c5  k  do_fork+0x5    [OPTIMIZED]
[root@...alhost tracing]# echo 0 > ../kprobes/enabled
[root@...alhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bc1c5  k  do_fork+0x5
[root@...alhost tracing]# echo 1 > ../kprobes/enabled
[root@...alhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bc1c5  k  do_fork+0x5    [OPTIMIZED]
------

So, looks OK to me too ;)

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>

Ingo,
Could you also pull this patch to your -tip tree?

Thank you,

> 
> Thank you.
> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  kernel/kprobes.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
>>> index bad4e95..b185464 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>>> @@ -2320,6 +2320,12 @@ static void arm_all_kprobes(void)
>>>  	if (!kprobes_all_disarmed)
>>>  		goto already_enabled;
>>>  
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * optimize_kprobe() called by arm_kprobe() checks
>>> +	 * kprobes_all_disarmed, so set kprobes_all_disarmed before
>>> +	 * arm_kprobe.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
>>>  	/* Arming kprobes doesn't optimize kprobe itself */
>>>  	for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
>>>  		head = &kprobe_table[i];
>>> @@ -2328,7 +2334,6 @@ static void arm_all_kprobes(void)
>>>  				arm_kprobe(p);
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
>>>  	printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally enabled\n");
>>>  
>>>  already_enabled:
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/