linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: spi-nand: add devicetree binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:59:41 -0300
From:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...tec.com>
To:	"Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)" 
	<peterpandong@...ron.com>,
	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@...il.com>
CC:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)" 
	<qiwang@...ron.com>,
	"Frank Liu 刘群 (frankliu)" 
	<frankliu@...ron.com>,
	"Melanie Zhang 张燕 (melaniezhang)" <melaniezhang@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: spi-nand: add devicetree binding



On 01/11/2015 10:57 PM, Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong) wrote:
>> On 01/08/2015 02:04 AM, Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong) wrote:
>>>>> This commit adds the devicetree binding document that specifies the
>>>>> spi nand devices support.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Pan <peterpandong@...ron.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.txt | 22
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-
>>>> nand.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.txt
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..9dd3efd
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.txt
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>>>>> +* NAND driver for MT29F, GD5F and similar SPI NAND flash chips
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Required properties:
>>>>> +- #address-cells, #size-cells : Must be present if the device has
>>>> sub-nodes
>>>>> +  representing partitions.
>>>>> +- compatible : Should be the manufacturer and the name of the chip.
>>>> Bear in mind
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unless I'm mistaken, we don't need the chip ID here, as SPI NAND
>> allows
>>>> to autodetect the device. Any reason why we can't just use a generic
>>>> compatible "spi-nand" here?
>>>> --
>>>> Ezequiel
>>>
>>> In fact, I don't know how to autodetect the SPI NAND device. Micron
>> device and
>>> Gigadevice device have different read ID functions. The Chip ID here
>> is used to
>>> determine which function to use.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't the difference between the Read ID very minor? One of the vendor
>> needs a 2-byte ID read, and the other one needs a 3-byte ID read.
>>
>> So you can just try with 2-byte, and if that fails (no vendor ID is
>> found on the first byte), you can try with the 3-byte command.
>>
>> It's not the most elegant solution, but it's not super awful either.
>> --
>> Ezequiel
> 
> I agree with your idea about try different ways to read ID. It is a better way
> to detect the chip if it can work properly.
> 
> The difference between the Read ID is that some chips need to send a dummy byte
> or address after opcode then read 2 byte, some chips needn't send any data after
> opcode but read 3 byte.
> 
> I'm concerned maybe chip will get into unknown or vendor specified state if we
> send the wrong sequence.
> 

Have you seen this happpening? Or this a potential/future problem?

For the latter, we can always fix it when the issue appears.
-- 
Ezequiel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/