linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch: support for repatching a function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54BE7657.2010105@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:37:59 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
CC:	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch: support for repatching a function

On 01/20/2015, 04:26 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Add support for patching a function multiple times.  If multiple patches
> affect a function, the function in the most recently enabled patch
> "wins".  This enables a cumulative patch upgrade path, where each patch
> is a superset of previous patches.
> 
> This requires restructuring the data a little bit.  With the current
> design, where each klp_func struct has its own ftrace_ops, we'd have to
> unregister the old ops and then register the new ops, because
> FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY prevents us from having two ops registered for
> the same function at the same time.  That would leave a regression
> window where the function isn't patched at all (not good for a patch
> upgrade path).
> 
> This patch replaces the per-klp_func ftrace_ops with a global klp_ops
> list, with one ftrace_ops per original function.  A single ftrace_ops is
> shared between all klp_funcs which have the same old_addr.  This allows
> the switch between function versions to happen instantaneously by
> updating the klp_ops struct's func_stack list.  The winner is the
> klp_func at the top of the func_stack (front of the list).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>

But...

> @@ -267,16 +303,28 @@ static int klp_write_object_relocations(struct module *pmod,
>  
>  static void notrace klp_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip,
>  				       unsigned long parent_ip,
> -				       struct ftrace_ops *ops,
> +				       struct ftrace_ops *fops,
>  				       struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	struct klp_func *func = ops->private;
> +	struct klp_ops *ops;
> +	struct klp_func *func;
> +
> +	ops = container_of(fops, struct klp_ops, fops);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	func = list_first_or_null_rcu(&ops->func_stack, struct klp_func,
> +				      stack_node);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!func))
> +		return;

If it ever happens, the warn will drown the machine in the output splash.

WARN_ON_RATELIMIT?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/