[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150120160248.GK13701@x1>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:02:48 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Inha Song <ideal.song@...sung.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/2] mfd: arizona: Update DT
binding to support OUTn_MONO init_data
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:20:05PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Inha Song wrote:
>
> > > This patch update DT binding to support OUTn_MONO init_data. Each
> > > output signal can be configurated as a mono differential output.
> > > The mono differential configuration is selected using the OUTn_MONO
> > > registers.
>
> > This requires a DT Ack and an entry in the example.
>
> The DT maintainers have said they're OK with maintainers just merging
> things if they're comfortable with it (see the bindings specific
> submitting-patches.txt) and given their workload and general resulting
> responsiveness it's going to make it difficult go get anything done.
I only tend to poke the DT guys when I am unsure of something in the
binding. In this case it was a doubt whether we should be encoding
register values inside a property like this.
I would also be happy to take it with your Ack if you're happy with
it?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists