linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/2] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding to support OUTn_MONO init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150120165708.GI30656@x1>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:57:08 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Inha Song <ideal.song@...sung.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/2] mfd: arizona: Update DT
 binding to support OUTn_MONO init_data

On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Charles Keepax wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:02:48PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:20:05PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Inha Song wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > This patch update DT binding to support OUTn_MONO init_data. Each
> > > > > output signal can be configurated as a mono differential output.
> > > > > The mono differential configuration is selected using the OUTn_MONO
> > > > > registers.
> > > 
> > > > This requires a DT Ack and an entry in the example.
> > > 
> > > The DT maintainers have said they're OK with maintainers just merging
> > > things if they're comfortable with it (see the bindings specific
> > > submitting-patches.txt) and given their workload and general resulting
> > > responsiveness it's going to make it difficult go get anything done.
> > 
> > I only tend to poke the DT guys when I am unsure of something in the
> > binding.  In this case it was a doubt whether we should be encoding
> > register values inside a property like this.
> > 
> > I would also be happy to take it with your Ack if you're happy with
> > it?
> 
> In this case really it is a boolean indicating if the
> corresponding output is mono or not. It is handled thusly in the
> code:
> 
> 		if (arizona->pdata.out_mono[i])
> 			val = ARIZONA_OUT1_MONO;
> 		else
> 			val = 0;
> 
> Perhaps some further wording tweaks on the Documentation patch
> would be appropriate, but certainly I am happy enough with the
> binding.

Very well.  As you and Mark seem happy with the approach I will be
more lenient on the next submission.  An example and some working
tweaks would improve chances of acceptance further still.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/