[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DsKT2rbSs8PuM6+KYcHZ6165-9eJPDXz=LJxiLW1tb-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:43:01 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount
root fs
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 05:16:45 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Ross Zwisler
>>
>> <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > These were just nuisance warnings, I believe, so my guess is that this
>> > isn't related to your kernel panic. Reverting Boaz's patches to make
>> > these warnings go away would let you know for sure.
>>
>> You are right. Reverting 937af5ecd0591e makes such warnings disappear.
>
> You guys are much quicker compiling kernels than I am :)
>
> Fabio, are you still seeing the same panic, just without the warnings? Or has
> the panic resolved itself as well?
Just to clarify: I was not getting the same panic Sabrina originally reported.
Reverting 937af5ecd0591e made the ram warnings go away.
On my case I am running linux-next 20150120 plus this fix:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg393205.html
and things seem to boot fine here on my ARM platform.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists