linux-kernel - [PATCH] staging: lustre: ptlrpc: fix lproc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:55:28 -0500
From:	Jon Bernard <jbernard@...ion.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:	oleg.drokin@...el.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
	HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jon Bernard <jbernard@...ion.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ptlrpc: fix lproc_ptlrpc static declarations

This patch fixes the following sparse warnings:

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c:51:3:warning:
 symbol 'll_rpc_opcode_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c:142:3: warning:
 symbol 'll_eopcode_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c:178:12: warning:
 symbol 'll_eopcode2str' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c:731:1: warning:
 symbol 'ptlrpc_lprocfs_svc_req_history_seek' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jon Bernard <jbernard@...ion.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c
index 90448e9..0e2071b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
 #include "ptlrpc_internal.h"
 
 
-struct ll_rpc_opcode {
+static struct ll_rpc_opcode {
 	__u32       opcode;
 	const char *opname;
 } ll_rpc_opcode_table[LUSTRE_MAX_OPCODES] = {
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct ll_rpc_opcode {
 	{ UPDATE_OBJ,	    "update_obj" },
 };
 
-struct ll_eopcode {
+static struct ll_eopcode {
 	__u32       opcode;
 	const char *opname;
 } ll_eopcode_table[EXTRA_LAST_OPC] = {
@@ -175,11 +175,12 @@ const char *ll_opcode2str(__u32 opcode)
 	return ll_rpc_opcode_table[offset].opname;
 }
 
-const char *ll_eopcode2str(__u32 opcode)
+static const char *ll_eopcode2str(__u32 opcode)
 {
 	LASSERT(ll_eopcode_table[opcode].opcode == opcode);
 	return ll_eopcode_table[opcode].opname;
 }
+
 #if defined (CONFIG_PROC_FS)
 static void ptlrpc_lprocfs_register(struct proc_dir_entry *root, char *dir,
 				    char *name,
@@ -727,7 +728,7 @@ struct ptlrpc_srh_iterator {
 	struct ptlrpc_request	*srhi_req;
 };
 
-int
+static int
 ptlrpc_lprocfs_svc_req_history_seek(struct ptlrpc_service_part *svcpt,
 				    struct ptlrpc_srh_iterator *srhi,
 				    __u64 seq)
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/