linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: serialize Offer and Rescind offer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1421810727.8384.2@smtp.corp.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:33:27 +0008
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: serialize Offer and Rescind
 offer



On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov 
<vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
> Commit 4b2f9abea52a ("staging: hv: convert channel_mgmt.c to not call
> osd_schedule_callback")' was written under an assumption that we 
> never receive
> Rescind offer while we're still processing the initial Offer request. 
> However,
> the issue we fixed in 04a258c162a8 could be caused by this assumption 
> not
> always being true.
> 
> In particular, we need to protect against the following:
> 1) Receiving a Rescind offer after we do queue_work() for processing 
> an Offer
>    request and before we actually enter vmbus_process_offer(). 
> work.func points
>    to vmbus_process_offer() at this moment and in 
> vmbus_onoffer_rescind() we do
>    another queue_work() without a check so we'll enter 
> vmbus_process_offer()
>    twice.
> 2) Receiving a Rescind offer after we enter vmbus_process_offer() and
>    especially after we set >state = CHANNEL_OPEN_STATE. Many things 
> can go
>    wrong in that case, e.g. we can call free_channel() while we're 
> still using
>    it.
> 
> Implement the required protection by changing work->func at the very 
> end of
> vmbus_process_offer() and checking work->func in 
> vmbus_onoffer_rescind(). In
> case we receive rescind offer during or before vmbus_process_offer() 
> is done
> we set rescind flag to true and we check it at the end of 
> vmbus_process_offer()
> so such offer will not get lost.
> 
> Suggested-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> 
>  drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> index c6fdd74..877a944 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> @@ -279,9 +279,6 @@ static void vmbus_process_offer(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>  	int ret;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	/* The next possible work is rescind handling */
> -	INIT_WORK(&newchannel->work, vmbus_process_rescind_offer);
> -
>  	/* Make sure this is a new offer */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&vmbus_connection.channel_lock, flags);
>  
> @@ -341,7 +338,7 @@ static void vmbus_process_offer(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>  			if (channel->sc_creation_callback != NULL)
>  				channel->sc_creation_callback(newchannel);
>  
> -			goto out;
> +			goto done_init_rescind;
>  		}
>  
>  		goto err_free_chan;
> @@ -382,7 +379,14 @@ static void vmbus_process_offer(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>  		kfree(newchannel->device_obj);
>  		goto err_free_chan;
>  	}
> -out:
> +done_init_rescind:
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&newchannel->lock, flags);
> +	/* The next possible work is rescind handling */
> +	INIT_WORK(&newchannel->work, vmbus_process_rescind_offer);
> +	/* Check if rescind offer was already received */
> +	if (newchannel->rescind)
> +		queue_work(newchannel->controlwq, &newchannel->work);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&newchannel->lock, flags);
>  	return;
>  err_free_chan:
>  	free_channel(newchannel);
> @@ -520,6 +524,7 @@ static void vmbus_onoffer_rescind(struct 
> vmbus_channel_message_header *hdr)
>  {
>  	struct vmbus_channel_rescind_offer *rescind;
>  	struct vmbus_channel *channel;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	rescind = (struct vmbus_channel_rescind_offer *)hdr;
>  	channel = relid2channel(rescind->child_relid);
> @@ -528,11 +533,20 @@ static void vmbus_onoffer_rescind(struct 
> vmbus_channel_message_header *hdr)
>  		/* Just return here, no channel found */
>  		return;
>  
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&channel->lock, flags);
>  	channel->rescind = true;
> +	/*
> +	 * channel->work.func != vmbus_process_rescind_offer means we are 
> still
> +	 * processing offer request and the rescind offer processing should 
> be
> +	 * postponed. It will be done at the very end of 
> vmbus_process_offer()
> +	 * as rescind flag is being checked there.
> +	 */
> +	if (channel->work.func == vmbus_process_rescind_offer)
> +		/* work is initialized for vmbus_process_rescind_offer() from
> +		 * vmbus_process_offer() where the channel got created */
> +		queue_work(channel->controlwq, &channel->work);
>  
> -	/* work is initialized for vmbus_process_rescind_offer() from
> -	 * vmbus_process_offer() where the channel got created */
> -	queue_work(channel->controlwq, &channel->work);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&channel->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/