linux-kernel - [RFCv2 0/2] dma-parms, constraints and helpers for dma-buf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1421813807-9178-1-git-send-email-sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:46:45 +0530
From:	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, robdclark@...il.com,
	daniel@...ll.ch, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	t.stanislaws@...sung.com, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Subject: [RFCv2 0/2] dma-parms, constraints and helpers for dma-buf

Hello Everyone,

Based on review comments received, I've split my earlier patchset on
'dma-buf constraints-enabled allocation' [1] into 2 sets:
- first one is this one, to use dma_parms and related parameters from
   struct device to share constraints, and then to use these constraints in
   dma-buf to help find the least common constraint set that could then be
   used by exporters to decide on allocation.

   This is a partial re-write of what Rob Clark proposed some while ago [2];
   I've tried to take care of review comments on his patchset, but any errors
   and omissions are, ofcourse, mine.

- Second part, one which I'm working on, and will post soon, aims at adding
   allocator-helpers in dma-buf framework which could use this constraint
   information to help choose the right allocator from a list.

While I work on the second part, I thought of sending the RFC for this one,
to get feedback on whether this mechanism seems ok to everyone.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/340
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/19/285

Rob Clark (1):
  device: add dma_params->max_segment_count

Sumit Semwal (1):
  dma-buf: add helpers for sharing attacher constraints with dma-parms

 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c   | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/device.h      |   1 +
 include/linux/dma-buf.h     |  22 ++++++++
 include/linux/dma-mapping.h |  19 +++++++
 4 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/