linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Per-user clock constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150121001537.GF27202@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:15:37 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Per-user clock constraints

On 01/20, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> 
> A rough test module was used to test this:
> 
> http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/tree/drivers/misc/clk-test.c?h=per-user-clk-constraints-v10
> 

Would it be possible to also send a patch for this? It would be
nice to have some unit test module for the entire framework and
this could be the start of such a module.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/