[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150121055532.GA15518@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:55:32 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip
tree
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ingo and Thomas-
> >>
> >> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
> >
> > This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip
> > tree now has the RCU commit it depends on, so could you please
> > rebase it on top of tip:core/rcu so I can pull it? I'll resolve
> > any remaining conflicts with the rest of -tip.
> >
>
> Sure, I can do that in the morning. The pull request merges cleanly
> with tip:core/rcu, though, so is the rebase needed?
Yes, because your changes rely on the RCU change (semantically),
so if anyone bisects into your commits it might result in a
subtly broken kernel, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists