[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501211043170.5526@nanos>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:43:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 17/19] resources: Move struct resource_list_entry
from ACPI into resource core
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/1/21 9:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> +
> >> +void resource_list_insert(struct list_head *head,
> >> + struct resource_list_entry *entry, bool tail)
> >
> > I would call this resource_list_add() if anything.
> >
> > Also it may be better to have two helpers, one for "add" and one for "add_tail"
> > (and perhaps define them as static inline?).
> We can't use inline functions here because that needs pulling list.h
> into ioport.h, then causing building issues to header inclusion order.
Create a new header file to avoid the circular dependencies then.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists