[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=WgbZGGtwmQwzWumjpYOsYHTt8vPQpTraABwJBsv5VXOmJ_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:41:00 +0200
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] Documentation: dt: add common bindings for hwspinlock
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> How about default to Linux id space and allow overriding that with
> a module param option if needed?
I'm not sure I'm following.
If the main point of contention is the base_id field, I'm also fine
with removing it entirely, as I'm not aware of any actual user for it
(Suman please confirm?).
Mark? Rob? Will you accept Suman's patches if the base_id field is removed?
Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists