lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:54:06 +0100
From:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC:	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Dylan Reid <dgreid@...omium.org>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] mmc: pwrseq_simple: Add support for a delay

On 01/21/2015 11:44 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 15 January 2015 at 18:33, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
>> On 01/15/2015 09:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
>>
>>
>> Ah, having read the explanation in the next patch, I think ...
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt
>>
>>
>>> +- delay : delay to wait after driving the reset gpio active [ms].
>>
>>
>> ... delay is the wrong name. reset-pulse-width or reset-pulse-length would
>> be better. delay sounds like a delay after resetting the device before it
>> can be accessed.
> 
> I agree with Stephen's proposal.

Cool.

> This patch needs to be rebased and retested on latest version the
> mmc-pwrseq patches.

Sure.

> Moreover, if you think the patchset which $subject
> patch is a part of is material for 3.20, I will need to share an
> immutable branch with the mmc-pwrseq patches for ARM SOC to pull in,
> tell me if you need that.

I don't think this will make 3.20 as I have other series with higher
priority and there's quite some work left to do on this one.

Regards,

Tomeu

> Kind regards
> Uffe
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ