[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAObsKBiMMNXMUPpOjNxLkrJ6NxdDgrVCVdCM4EPRtuysi1yOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:55:18 +0100
From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Dylan Reid <dgreid@...omium.org>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] mmc: pwrseq_simple: Add support for a delay
On 21 January 2015 at 15:15, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 21 January 2015 at 14:54, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> wrote:
>> On 01/21/2015 11:44 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 15 January 2015 at 18:33, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
>>>> On 01/15/2015 09:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah, having read the explanation in the next patch, I think ...
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt
>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc,pwrseq-simple.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +- delay : delay to wait after driving the reset gpio active [ms].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... delay is the wrong name. reset-pulse-width or reset-pulse-length would
>>>> be better. delay sounds like a delay after resetting the device before it
>>>> can be accessed.
>>>
>>> I agree with Stephen's proposal.
>>
>> Cool.
>>
>>> This patch needs to be rebased and retested on latest version the
>>> mmc-pwrseq patches.
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>>> Moreover, if you think the patchset which $subject
>>> patch is a part of is material for 3.20, I will need to share an
>>> immutable branch with the mmc-pwrseq patches for ARM SOC to pull in,
>>> tell me if you need that.
>>
>> I don't think this will make 3.20 as I have other series with higher
>> priority and there's quite some work left to do on this one.
>
> If that's the case, I might as well consider this patch separately and
> take it through my mmc tree. Of course, that means you anyway need to
> rebase/test it.
Sounds good, I expect to send a v3 tomorrow.
Regards,
Tomeu
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists