[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150121155641.GE6858@xora-yoga-13.xora.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:56:41 +0000
From: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"wangyijing@...wei.com" <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
"phoenix.liyi@...wei.com" <phoenix.liyi@...wei.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
"parth.dixit@...aro.org" <parth.dixit@...aro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi"
and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:42:43PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:29:52PM +0000, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On 01/21/2015 10:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > I have some questions for the ACPI and EFI folk:
> > >
> > > 1. When booting with ACPI, are the EFI run-time services required for
> > > anything? If yes, Xen may have a bigger problem
> >
> > Yes. At least for some things. For example, installing an Operating
> > System would require that you make runtime services calls to set the
> > BootOrder/BootNext variables, and so on. Further, we use the GetTime
> > service and EFI based reboot to avoid having special drivers. I had
> > those added to SBBR as requirements for that reason.
>
> So what would a kexec'ed kernel do here? Or we usually expect it to be
> short lived and doesn't need reboot, nor GetTime.
>
> Xen is slightly more problematic but I wonder whether it could run a
> (paravirtualised) UEFI.
>
> > > 2. Could a boot loader (either kernel doing kexec or Xen) emulate the
> > > EFI system/config tables and still make them useful to the kernel but
> > > without EFI_BOOT or EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES?
> >
> > Yes. But again, without the other required pieces (including the
> > services function pointers in the systab which are required) you'd crash
> > soon after boot trying to make those calls.
>
> My point was whether you can still pass information like RSDP address
> via EFI tables but explicitly disable runtime services so that the
> kernel won't try to make such calls (and crash).
>
There is no specific dependency from ACPI->EFI its just the only current
method defind to get the RSDP pointer. It would work just as well
getting the pointer from /chosen/ if we just pick a node and document it
for Xen/kexec/other usage.
We were running ACPI on machine from u-boot doing exactly this for
a long time.
Graeme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists