[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421856321.10574.13.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:05:21 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: unclear ipv6 redirect message (was Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mfd:
lubbock_io: add lubbock_io board)
(adding netdev)
On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 09:44 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:46:29AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> > Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> writes:
> >
> > > What I'd suggest (and always have done) is:
> > >
> > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't request main irq%d: %d\n",
> > > irq, ret);
> > I like it, it's even more compact, I'll use it for next patch version.
>
> BTW, this is an example why I have the policy of always ensuring that
> the kernel messages print sufficient diagnostics. Right now, I have
> a problem - since I rebooted my firewall a few nights ago, I now get
> on one of my machines:
>
> rt6_redirect: source isn't a valid nexthop for redirect target
>
> and it spews that for a few minutes every 26 hours or so. No further
> information, and it leaves you wondering "well, what was the invalid
> next hop? What was the source?"
>
> Pretty much the only way to try and find out is to leave a tcpdump or
> wireshark running for 24 hours to try and get a dump - which is not
> that easy if you don't have lots of disk space. So, right now, I have
> no way to diagnose the above.
>
> If it printed that information, then I'd be able to see what the
> addresses were, and I'd probably be able to come up with a tcpdump
> filter which didn't involve logging all IPv6 traffic.
>
> Kernel messages need to be smart. If not, they might as well just be
> "The kernel encountered a problem. Abort, Retry or Fail?"
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists