lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1421857209.171127.216796445.0DC88E13@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:20:09 +0100
From:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] x86_64: cleanup THREAD_INFO(reg,offset) macro

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 14:40, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Alexander van Heukelum
> <heukelum@...tmail.fm> wrote:
> > The macro THREAD_INFO(reg,offset) is used in assembly to compute the
> > offset between the user ptregs and the thread_info struct. Change
> > the macro and all its uses so that offset is given as the current
> > top of stack in the pt_regs frame. The generated code is identical.
> 
> What is the purpose of doing this?
> 
> I don't mean to say that it's pointless, but it is also not obvious
> why it's better than the code before patch.

Just because I had a hard time understanding what the offset
parameter means. Turns out Borislav did another variant in his
patchset. Quoting him from the commit message which made
that the change:
> Semi-mysterious expressions THREAD_INFO(%rsp,RIP) - "why RIP??"
> are now replaced by more logical THREAD_INFO(%rsp,SIZEOF_PTREGS) -
> "rsp is SIZEOF_PTREGS bytes below the top, calculate
> thread_info's address using that information"

Borislav expresses "offset" as an offset from the stack's page
boundary,while I chose the offset from the start of struct
pt_regs on the stack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ