[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150121163107.GA19618@cloud>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:31:07 -0800
From: josh@...htriplett.org
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@...il.com>, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org, mhocko@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: Conditionally support non-root users, groups
and capabilities
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:52:19PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> The proposed patch generates a whole mass of ifdefs all over the place.
> If it's going to be done move all the functions in question together
> somewhere logical and give them a single ifdef or a file of their own.
I assume the header-file ifdefs are not problematic. The functions in
kernel/sys.c are already grouped together in a single block and needed
only one ifdef. So I'd assume the main problem is the multiple ifdefs
in capability.c and groups.c? Might be possible to consolidate those,
sure.
> It also doesn't appear to be dropping all it should - why can't you
> simply not compile in groups.c for example ? If you can't then it says
> the patch is far from complete at this point.
Making groups.c entirely optional has been on the todo list for a while;
it's rather harder than just dropping the syscalls, as some of its
other functions are exported to the rest of the kernel as well, but it's
doable.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists