[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7486641.U1I25nUFqS@soho>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:51:09 +0100
From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo@...xarxa.net>
To: linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey@....msu.ru>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Andreas Sommer <hsommer@....org>,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-parport] [PATCHv4 2/2] parport: parport_pc: Implement CPU model check to cut off false-positives
El Dimecres, 13 d'agost de 2014, a les 12:04:55, Matwey V. Kornilov va
escriure:
> Hi,
>
> What do you think, would it be better just to left the check for all
> x86 32-bit hardware?.
>
Finally,
finally this patch was applied?
Best regards,
Leopold
--
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists