lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7486641.U1I25nUFqS@soho>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:51:09 +0100
From:	Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo@...xarxa.net>
To:	linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	"Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey@....msu.ru>,
	Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Andreas Sommer <hsommer@....org>,
	gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-parport] [PATCHv4 2/2] parport: parport_pc: Implement CPU model check to cut off false-positives

El Dimecres, 13 d'agost de 2014, a les 12:04:55, Matwey V. Kornilov va 
escriure:
> Hi,
> 
> What do you think, would it be better just to left the check for all
> x86 32-bit hardware?.
> 

Finally,

finally this patch was applied? 

Best regards,

Leopold


-- 
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ