linux-kernel - Re: [Linux-parport] [PATCHv4 2/2] parport: parport_pc: Implement CPU model check to cut off false-positives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:51:09 +0100
From:	Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo@...xarxa.net>
To:	linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	"Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey@....msu.ru>,
	Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Andreas Sommer <hsommer@....org>,
	gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-parport] [PATCHv4 2/2] parport: parport_pc: Implement CPU model check to cut off false-positives

El Dimecres, 13 d'agost de 2014, a les 12:04:55, Matwey V. Kornilov va 
escriure:
> Hi,
> 
> What do you think, would it be better just to left the check for all
> x86 32-bit hardware?.
> 

Finally,

finally this patch was applied? 

Best regards,

Leopold


-- 
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)