[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150121173128.GV26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:31:28 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
t.stanislaws@...sung.com, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
robdclark@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 2/2] dma-buf: add helpers for sharing attacher
constraints with dma-parms
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:46:47AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> +static int calc_constraints(struct device *dev,
> + struct dma_buf_constraints *calc_cons)
> +{
> + struct dma_buf_constraints cons = *calc_cons;
> +
> + cons.dma_mask &= dma_get_mask(dev);
I don't think this makes much sense when you consider that the DMA
infrastructure supports buses with offsets. The DMA mask is th
upper limit of the _bus_ specific address, it is not a mask per-se.
What this means is that &= is not the right operation. Moreover,
simply comparing masks which could be from devices on unrelated
buses doesn't make sense either.
However, that said, I don't have an answer for what you want to
achieve here.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists