[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421862727.10574.25.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:52:07 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Custom printk format specifier for device node
On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 19:39 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> > On Jan 21, 2015, at 19:37 , Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 19:06 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> 90% of the usage of device node's full_name is printing it out
> >> in a kernel message. Preparing for the eventual delayed allocation
> >> introduce a custom printk format specifier that is both more
> >> compact and more pleasant to the eye.
> >>
> >> For instance typical use is:
> >> pr_info("Frobbing node %s\n", node->full_name);
> >>
> >> Which can be written now as:
> >> pr_info("Frobbing node %pO\n", node);
> >
> > Still disliking use of %p0.
> >
>
> Choices are limited. And it’s pO not p0.
Yet another reason to dislike it.
> > This isn't pretty. Perhaps there's a better way?
> >
>
> No there isn’t.
There always is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists