linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150121182905.GQ29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:29:05 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
	Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount
 root fs

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:32:13AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Another data point (though I have no idea if it is useful or what it means):
> 
> In the working case, path_init sets nd->flags to 0x50 or 0x51.
> In the non-working case (ie for all files with a '/' in the name),
> it sets nd->flags to 0x10 or 0x11, even though it is always called
> with the LOOKUP_RCU bit set in flags.

Umm...  Are those path_init() succeeding or failing?  Note that path_init()
includes "walk everything except for the last component", so your non-working
case is "have it walk anything at all".  What's failing there?  path_init()
or handling the remaining component?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/