[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALnjE+qHjf5djBybPQUzoR_+dxDskQJQwtgvSN=G5NW9pckETw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:31:35 -0800
From: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
To: Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v13 5/5] openvswitch: Add support for unique flow IDs.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com> wrote:
> Previously, flows were manipulated by userspace specifying a full,
> unmasked flow key. This adds significant burden onto flow
> serialization/deserialization, particularly when dumping flows.
>
> This patch adds an alternative way to refer to flows using a
> variable-length "unique flow identifier" (UFID). At flow setup time,
> userspace may specify a UFID for a flow, which is stored with the flow
> and inserted into a separate table for lookup, in addition to the
> standard flow table. Flows created using a UFID must be fetched or
> deleted using the UFID.
>
> All flow dump operations may now be made more terse with OVS_UFID_F_*
> flags. For example, the OVS_UFID_F_OMIT_KEY flag allows responses to
> omit the flow key from a datapath operation if the flow has a
> corresponding UFID. This significantly reduces the time spent assembling
> and transacting netlink messages. With all OVS_UFID_F_OMIT_* flags
> enabled, the datapath only returns the UFID and statistics for each flow
> during flow dump, increasing ovs-vswitchd revalidator performance by 40%
> or more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com>
Its almost ready. But I saw minor issues,
few checkpatch.pl failures.
in ovs_flow_cmd_new() we should use unmasked key to lookup in flow
table for legacy case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists