[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150121233553.19d9ac5c@grimm.local.home>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:35:53 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] tracing: Add new file system tracefs
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 04:23:30 +0000
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> I would recommend against that - kernfs is overburdened by their need
> to accomodate cgroup weirdness. IMO it's not a good model for
> anything, other than an anti-hard-drugs poster ("don't shoot that
> shit, or you might end up hallucinating _this_").
OK, I'm not the only one that thought kernfs seemed to go all over the
place. I guess I now know why. It was more of a hook for cgroups. I can
understand why cgroups needed it, as I found that creating files from a
mkdir and removing them with rmdir causes some pain in vfs with
handling of locking. As that's what I'm working on overcoming now.
But I think I solved my issues (testing it now), and hopefully by
tomorrow, I'll have a V2 out.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists