linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, vmacache: Add kconfig VMACACHE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:57:42 +0800
From:	WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmacache: Add kconfig VMACACHE_SHIFT

Hi, Davidlohr

On 01/21/15 at 11:46pm, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 14:29 +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> > Add a new kconfig option VMACACHE_SHIFT (as a power of 2) to specify the
> > number of slots vma cache has for each thread. Range is chosen 0-4 (1-16
> > slots) to consider both overhead and performance penalty. Default is 2
> > (4 slots) as it originally is, which provides good enough balance.
> > 
> 
> Nack. I don't feel comfortable making scalability features of core code
> configurable.

Out of respect, is this a general rule not making scalability features
of core code configurable?

Thanks
WANG Chao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/