[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpTT3J-D6CqPcUdcTq4d=tMy7dDSn_ZZJGD12qeey4p9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:02:03 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Karol Wrona <k.wrona@...sung.com>
Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Karol Wrona <wrona.vy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mmc: dw_mmc: Add runtime pm to dw_mmc
On 21 January 2015 at 17:43, Karol Wrona <k.wrona@...sung.com> wrote:
> This patch adds runtime pm handling to dw_mmc and enables it for dw_mmc-exynos.
> It mainly uses mci_request/mci_request_end for mmc host state information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karol Wrona <k.wrona@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> index 12a5eaa..7281c6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> @@ -17,12 +17,15 @@
> #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include "dw_mmc.h"
> #include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
> #include "dw_mmc-exynos.h"
>
> +#define DWMMC_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 200
Normally we use 50 as default. Any reason to why you can't use that?
Hmm, maybe we should have such a default defined in a common mmc host
header file!?
> +
> /* Variations in Exynos specific dw-mshc controller */
> enum dw_mci_exynos_type {
> DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4210,
> @@ -97,6 +100,30 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_clock(struct dw_mci *host)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int dw_mci_exynos_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct dw_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* empty for now */
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_mci_exynos_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct dw_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* empty for now */
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +#define dw_mci_exynos_runtime_suspend NULL
> +#define dw_mci_exynos_runtime_resume NULL
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
I would suggest you to remove all the above code from this patch. If
you want to add the callbacks, let's anyway do that from a separate
patch.
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int dw_mci_exynos_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -179,6 +206,8 @@ static void dw_mci_exynos_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> unsigned long actual;
> u8 div = priv->ciu_div + 1;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(host->dev);
> +
> if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) {
> if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7 ||
> priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7_SMU)
> @@ -196,6 +225,9 @@ static void dw_mci_exynos_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> mci_writel(host, CLKSEL, priv->sdr_timing);
> }
>
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
> +
> /*
> * Don't care if wanted clock is zero or
> * ciu clock is unavailable
> @@ -405,16 +437,49 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dw_mci_exynos_match);
>
> static int dw_mci_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + int ret;
> const struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data;
> const struct of_device_id *match;
>
> match = of_match_node(dw_mci_exynos_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
> drv_data = match->data;
> - return dw_mci_pltfm_register(pdev, drv_data);
> + ret = dw_mci_pltfm_register(pdev, drv_data);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "register error\n");
> + goto err_pm_dis;
> + }
> +
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, DWMMC_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY);
> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +err_pm_dis:
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> +static int __exit dw_mci_exynos_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + dw_mci_pltfm_remove(pdev);
> +
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +}
> static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_mci_exynos_pmops = {
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_mci_exynos_suspend, dw_mci_exynos_resume)
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_mci_exynos_runtime_suspend,
> + dw_mci_exynos_runtime_resume, NULL)
> .resume_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq,
> .thaw_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq,
> .restore_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq,
> @@ -422,7 +487,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_mci_exynos_pmops = {
>
> static struct platform_driver dw_mci_exynos_pltfm_driver = {
> .probe = dw_mci_exynos_probe,
> - .remove = __exit_p(dw_mci_pltfm_remove),
> + .remove = __exit_p(dw_mci_exynos_remove),
> .driver = {
> .name = "dwmmc_exynos",
> .of_match_table = dw_mci_exynos_match,
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 4d2e3c2..1e66d7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/slot-gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>
> #include "dw_mmc.h"
>
> @@ -112,6 +113,8 @@ static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> struct mmc_command *stop;
> struct mmc_data *data;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(slot->host->dev);
> +
> /* Make sure we get a consistent snapshot */
> spin_lock_bh(&slot->host->lock);
> mrq = slot->mrq;
> @@ -141,6 +144,9 @@ static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
>
> spin_unlock_bh(&slot->host->lock);
>
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(slot->host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(slot->host->dev);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1043,6 +1049,8 @@ static void dw_mci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>
> WARN_ON(slot->mrq);
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(host->dev);
> +
> /*
> * The check for card presence and queueing of the request must be
> * atomic, otherwise the card could be removed in between and the
> @@ -1054,6 +1062,9 @@ static void dw_mci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
> mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
> mmc_request_done(mmc, mrq);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -1069,6 +1080,8 @@ static void dw_mci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> u32 regs;
> int ret;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(slot->host->dev);
> +
> switch (ios->bus_width) {
> case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4:
> slot->ctype = SDMMC_CTYPE_4BIT;
> @@ -1116,7 +1129,7 @@ static void dw_mci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> dev_err(slot->host->dev,
> "failed to enable vmmc regulator\n");
> /*return, if failed turn on vmmc*/
> - return;
> + goto _end;
> }
> }
> set_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_NEED_INIT, &slot->flags);
> @@ -1150,6 +1163,10 @@ static void dw_mci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> default:
> break;
> }
> +
> +_end:
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(slot->host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(slot->host->dev);
> }
>
> static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> @@ -1157,12 +1174,17 @@ static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> u32 status;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(slot->host->dev);
> +
> /*
> * Check the busy bit which is low when DAT[3:0]
> * (the data lines) are 0000
> */
> status = mci_readl(slot->host, STATUS);
>
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(slot->host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(slot->host->dev);
> +
> return !!(status & SDMMC_STATUS_BUSY);
> }
>
> @@ -1175,6 +1197,8 @@ static int dw_mci_switch_voltage(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> int min_uv, max_uv;
> int ret;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(host->dev);
> +
> /*
> * Program the voltage. Note that some instances of dw_mmc may use
> * the UHS_REG for this. For other instances (like exynos) the UHS_REG
> @@ -1202,6 +1226,9 @@ static int dw_mci_switch_voltage(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> }
> mci_writel(host, UHS_REG, uhs);
>
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1211,6 +1238,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> int gpio_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc);
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(slot->host->dev);
> +
> /* Use platform get_ro function, else try on board write protect */
> if ((slot->quirks & DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT) ||
> (slot->host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT))
> @@ -1221,6 +1250,9 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> read_only =
> mci_readl(slot->host, WRTPRT) & (1 << slot->id) ? 1 : 0;
>
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(slot->host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(slot->host->dev);
> +
> dev_dbg(&mmc->class_dev, "card is %s\n",
> read_only ? "read-only" : "read-write");
>
> @@ -1235,6 +1267,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> int gpio_cd = mmc_gpio_get_cd(mmc);
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(host->dev);
> +
> /* Use platform get_cd function, else try onboard card detect */
> if (brd->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
> present = 1;
> @@ -1254,6 +1288,9 @@ static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
>
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
> +
> return present;
> }
>
> @@ -1262,6 +1299,8 @@ static void dw_mci_init_card(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_card *card)
> struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(host->dev);
> +
> /*
> * Low power mode will stop the card clock when idle. According to the
> * description of the CLKENA register we should disable low power mode
> @@ -1289,6 +1328,9 @@ static void dw_mci_init_card(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_card *card)
> SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> }
> }
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
> }
>
> static void dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
> @@ -1298,6 +1340,9 @@ static void dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
> unsigned long irqflags;
> u32 int_mask;
>
> + if (enb)
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(slot->host->dev);
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
>
> /* Enable/disable Slot Specific SDIO interrupt */
> @@ -1309,6 +1354,12 @@ static void dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
> mci_writel(host, INTMASK, int_mask);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
> +
> + /* If interrupt is enabled leave device active. */
> + if (!enb) {
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(slot->host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(slot->host->dev);
> + }
> }
>
> static int dw_mci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> @@ -1318,8 +1369,14 @@ static int dw_mci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> const struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data = host->drv_data;
> int err = -ENOSYS;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(host->dev);
> +
> if (drv_data && drv_data->execute_tuning)
> err = drv_data->execute_tuning(slot);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
> +
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -1361,8 +1418,12 @@ static void dw_mci_request_end(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>
> if (host->state == STATE_SENDING_CMD11)
> host->state = STATE_WAITING_CMD11_DONE;
> - else
> + else {
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
> +
> host->state = STATE_IDLE;
> + }
> }
>
> spin_unlock(&host->lock);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
An overall comment: I think most of the calls to pm_runtime_get|put()
should be done in the generic dw_mmc.c layer.
For example, look at the path in ->set_ios(). It's not enough that the
exynos specific callback ->set_ios() (in the struct dw_mci_drv_data)
invokes pm_runtime_get|put(), since the common dw_mci_set_ios()
function is also accessing the controller's registers.
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists