linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: pmc_atom: save struct device pointer in pmc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1421918985.31903.113.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:29:45 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"Kumar P, Mahesh" <mahesh.kumar.p@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: pmc_atom: save struct device pointer in pmc

On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 11:42 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2015/1/21 5:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The change allows to use dev_printk() type of macros in the module functions.
> 
> The patch itself looks good to me, but not sure why do we need this
> change, will we use dev_prink in the subsequent patches?

Has no relations to the rest, indeed. Just found that would be easier to
send them together.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/