[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C042D2.4040809@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:22:42 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Konstantin Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Chernenkov <dmitryc@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <adech.fo@...il.com>,
Yuri Gribov <tetra2005@...il.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Kernel address sanitizer - runtime memory debugger.
On 01/21/2015 11:51 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> Changes since v8:
> - Fixed unpoisoned redzones for not-allocated-yet object
> in newly allocated slab page. (from Dmitry C.)
>
> - Some minor non-function cleanups in kasan internals.
>
> - Added ack from Catalin
>
> - Added stack instrumentation. With this we could detect
> out of bounds accesses in stack variables. (patch 12)
>
> - Added globals instrumentation - catching out of bounds in
> global varibles. (patches 13-17)
>
> - Shadow moved out from vmalloc into hole between vmemmap
> and %esp fixup stacks. For globals instrumentation
> we will need shadow backing modules addresses.
> So we need some sort of a shadow memory allocator
> (something like vmmemap_populate() function, except
> that it should be available after boot).
>
> __vmalloc_node_range() suits that purpose, except that
> it can't be used for allocating for shadow in vmalloc
> area because shadow in vmalloc is already 'allocated'
> to protect us from other vmalloc users. So we need
> 16TB of unused addresses. And we have big enough hole
> between vmemmap and %esp fixup stacks. So I moved shadow
> there.
I'm not sure which new addition caused it, but I'm getting tons of
false positives from platform drivers trying to access memory they
don't "own" - because they expect to find hardware there.
I suspect we'd need to mark that memory region somehow to prevent
accesses to it from triggering warnings?
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists