[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C10ED0.1010302@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:53:04 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
James Dingwall <james@...gwall.me.uk>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.18.2 / xen 4.4.1 dom0 - microcode oops
On 01/22/2015 09:48 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/22/2015 03:20 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Hmm,
>>
>> and I thought we fixed all that fun. It seems not :-\
>>
>> Boris, this paravirt_enabled() thing doesn't seem to work or why are we
>> even calling microcode_exit()?
>
> Looks like something is unloading microcode driver (init scripts
> perhaps) and so we are trying to unregister device that we never
> registered (because we had early return from microcode_init() when we
> loaded it).
>
> I actually suspect the same bug would be triggered if dis_ucode_ldr is
> true on baremetal.
>
> So we need something like:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> @@ -625,6 +625,9 @@ static void __exit microcode_exit(void)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
>
> + if (paravirt_enabled() || dis_ucode_ldr)
> + return 0;
Plain 'return', of course.
Alternatively, we could return an error (-EINVAL?) from microcode_init()
when either of these two conditions is true.
-boris
> +
> microcode_dev_exit();
>
> unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&mc_cpu_notifier);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists