[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150122154930.GA28027@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:49:30 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Yan Liu <yan@...estorage.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NVMe: Do not take nsid while a passthrough IO
command is being issued via a block device file descriptor
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:21:28PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote:
> The case I considered was the "hidden" attribute in the NVMe LBA Range
> Type feature. It only indicates the storage should be hidden from the OS
> for general use, but the host may still use it for special purposes. In
> truth, the driver doesn't handle the hidden attribute very well and it
> doesn't seem like a well thought out feature in the spec anyway.
At least for Linux we should simply ignore that attribute.
> But if you really need to restrict namespace access, shouldn't that be
> enforced on the target side with reservations or similar mechanism?
Think for example about containers where we give eah container access
to a single nvme namespace, including container root access. Here you
don't really want container A to be able to submit I/O for another
container. A similar case exists for virtualization where we had
problems with SCSI passthrough from guests.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists