| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:01:15 +0100 From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] samples/bpf: Fix test_maps/bpf_get_next_key() test Looks like the "test_maps" test case expects to get the keys in the wrong order when iterating over the elements: test_maps: samples/bpf/test_maps.c:79: test_hashmap_sanity: Assertion `bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &key, &next_key) == 0 && next_key == 2' failed. Aborted Fix this and test for the correct order. Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> --- samples/bpf/test_maps.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/samples/bpf/test_maps.c +++ b/samples/bpf/test_maps.c @@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ static void test_hashmap_sanity(int i, v /* iterate over two elements */ assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &key, &next_key) == 0 && - next_key == 2); - assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == 0 && next_key == 1); + assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == 0 && + next_key == 2); assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == -1 && errno == ENOENT); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists