[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421943573.4903.24.camel@stgolabs.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:19:33 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmacache: Add kconfig VMACACHE_SHIFT
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 15:57 +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> Hi, Davidlohr
>
> On 01/21/15 at 11:46pm, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 14:29 +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> > > Add a new kconfig option VMACACHE_SHIFT (as a power of 2) to specify the
> > > number of slots vma cache has for each thread. Range is chosen 0-4 (1-16
> > > slots) to consider both overhead and performance penalty. Default is 2
> > > (4 slots) as it originally is, which provides good enough balance.
> > >
> >
> > Nack. I don't feel comfortable making scalability features of core code
> > configurable.
>
> Out of respect, is this a general rule not making scalability features
> of core code configurable?
I doubt its a rule, just common sense. Users have no business
configuring such low level details. The optimizations need to
transparently work for everyone.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists