[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1904775.fjUp0pyajn@sifl>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:24:10 -0500
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
sd@...asysnail.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] audit: replace getname()/putname() hacks with reference counters
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 11:09:42 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/01/22, Paul Moore wrote:
> > In order to ensure that filenames are not released before the audit
> > subsystem is done with the strings there are a number of hacks built
> > into the fs and audit subsystems around getname() and putname(). To
> > say these hacks are "ugly" would be kind.
> >
> > This patch removes the filename hackery in favor of a more
> > conventional reference count based approach. The diffstat below tells
> > most of the story; lots of audit/fs specific code is replaced with a
> > traditional reference count based approach that is easily understood,
> > even by those not familiar with the audit and/or fs subsystems.
> >
> > CC: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
> > CC: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
>
> Noted change of bumping refcnt before passing back pointer to struct
> filename.
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Thanks for taking another look at the patch set.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists