[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C1254A.4090106@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:28:58 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: Deletion of checks before the function call "iounmap"
> The only evidence I see is a long thread of similar patches from
> the last several months, of varying (though not increasing) quality.
I find it acceptable that some of my update suggestions do not fit
to your quality expectations at the moment.
> Prior objections to your approach were met with a distinct lack
> of self-awareness on your part.
I guess that a bit more clarification of this view will help
to resolve some open issues, won't it?
> I don't really see many challenges here to tackle, except for the
> social issue of dealing with patch bots like you.
I hope that you will like other automatic source code analysis results.
> Your automated patches are generally not solving real problems,
I try to clean-up Linux source files a bit. Problem solving
with a higher value might follow ...
> but they are at times introducing bugs.
There are the usual different opinions and disagreements
which might be still waiting for a constructive solution.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists