[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150122171102.GH12079@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:11:02 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
Kanaka Juvva <kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Perf tests for hw events
On Thu, 22 Jan, at 09:59:52AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> At some point 'perf test' should grow infrastructure to specify what is
> required for a test so that it auto-skips those, possibly not even
> bothering the user telling something can't be tested. Right now for
> things like tests that requires finding a vmlinux, if it doesn't find
> it, it will just print "Skipped", etc.
Yeah, that makes sense. I'll take a look at that.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists