linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] printk: Add dummy routine for when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJhHMCDjKGunTDuU7Rgtk2CH2ZENJ8Zbzvzuoj2hwLDnd6rbVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:12:23 -0500
From:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
	Simon Kågström 
	<simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] printk: Add dummy routine for when CONFIG_PRINTK=n

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Tue 2015-01-20 18:51:49, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> There are missing dummy routines for log_buf_addr_get() and log_buf_len_get()
>> for when CONFIG_PRINTK is not set causing build failures.
>>
>> This patch adds these dummy routines at the appropriate location.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
>> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/printk.h | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
>> index aeb9d7f..f52f02b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/printk.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/printk.h
>> @@ -10,9 +10,6 @@
>>  extern const char linux_banner[];
>>  extern const char linux_proc_banner[];
>>
>> -extern char *log_buf_addr_get(void);
>> -extern u32 log_buf_len_get(void);
>> -
>>  static inline int printk_get_level(const char *buffer)
>>  {
>>       if (buffer[0] == KERN_SOH_ASCII && buffer[1]) {
>> @@ -168,6 +165,8 @@ void __init setup_log_buf(int early);
>>  void dump_stack_set_arch_desc(const char *fmt, ...);
>>  void dump_stack_print_info(const char *log_lvl);
>>  void show_regs_print_info(const char *log_lvl);
>> +char *log_buf_addr_get(void);
>> +u32 log_buf_len_get(void);
>>  #else
>>  static inline __printf(1, 0)
>>  int vprintk(const char *s, va_list args)
>> @@ -217,6 +216,16 @@ static inline void dump_stack_print_info(const char *log_lvl)
>>  static inline void show_regs_print_info(const char *log_lvl)
>>  {
>>  }
>> +
>> +static inline char *log_buf_addr_get(void)
>> +{
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static linline u32 log_buf_len_get(void)
>           ^
>           typo: linline -> inline

Argh, shows why we should always atleast build test before sending a
patch, no matter how trivial it is.

>
> Otherwise, it looks fine to me.
>
> Well, If you send v2, I would move this above log_buf_kexec_setup() in
> both #ifdef branches. So that all four log_buf()-related functions
> declared/defined together.

I will update as you said in v2.

Thanks!
-- 
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/