linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: TLS regression fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFyQ9zfeNoboW_ypYoKCO55CM_9X0Qgi5NkU4AAqSmPuWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:56:35 +1200
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: TLS regression fixes

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> Thoughts?

Looks good to me.

And since I curse at people who ignore regression reports because "it
fixes a bug", I should take the time to say how much I liked seeing
you explain to the people who reported this regression why it happened
and what the thinking was. Now *that* is how things should work. "My
bad, this was the background for why it seemed like a good idea".

And I guess the second patch should also be marked for stable, since
the thing that causes problems got backported too.

                 Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/