[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150123053056.GC29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 05:30:56 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-audit@...hat.com, rgb@...hat.com, sd@...asysnail.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:40:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:29:03PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:25:13PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > > Your experimental branch looks good to me, thanks.
> >
> > Pushed into for-next; I'm probably going to move that stuff into a never-rebased
> > branch, merged into for-next and safe to pull into your tree if you want to do
> > something on top of that set.
>
> OK, vfs.git#getname is it; it's in never-to-be-rebased mode and it's merged
> into vfs.git#for-next (as of right now; HEAD is 9ee4c4). If you need to do
> something on top of that stuff, pulling vfs.git#getname is safe.
Unfortunately, that thing was -rc2-based, leading to conflict with mainline
in kernel/auditsc.c. My fault, I hadn't realized that "audit: create private
file name copies when auditing inodes" in audit tree was, in fact, present in
mainline. vfs.git#getname2 is -rc3-based, same resulting kernel/auditsc.c as
in #getname. Please, use that. vfs.git#for-next merges from that one now,
so tomorrow -next should have no problems from vfs.git...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists