linux-kernel - gpio: ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1422008501.30730.22.camel@x220>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:21:41 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Cc:	Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
	Andy Green <andy.green@...aro.org>,
	Vincent Yang <Vincent.Yang@...fujitsu.com>,
	Tetsuya Nuriya <nuriya.tetsuya@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: gpio: ARCH_MB86S7X?

Jassi,

Your commit 0da094d82c27 ("gpio: Add Fujitsu MB86S7x GPIO driver") is
included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150123). I noticed because a
script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem in it.

That commit added the Kconfig symbol GPIO_MB86S7X and made it depend on
ARCH_MB86S7X. But there's no Kconfig symbol ARCH_MB86S7X in linux-next.
I assume a patch to add that symbol is queued somewhere. Is that
correct?

Please note that I actually managed to cross-compile
drivers/gpio/gpio-mb86s7x.c with this command:
    make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnu- EXTRA_CFLAGS="-DCONFIG_GPIOLIB=y" drivers/gpio/gpio-mb86s7x.o

So, for what it's worth, that dependency appears to be not needed to
build this driver.

Thanks,

Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/