[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1422011280.30730.34.camel@x220>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:08:00 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Andy Green <andy.green@...aro.org>,
Vincent Yang <Vincent.Yang@...fujitsu.com>,
Tetsuya Nuriya <nuriya.tetsuya@...fujitsu.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gpio: ARCH_MB86S7X?
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 11:55 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On 23 January 2015 at 15:51, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
>
> >> So, for what it's worth, that dependency appears to be not needed to
> >> build this driver.
> >>
> > Linus.W, what do you suggest? Just drop the dependency?
>
> Nah, not right now atleast. As there is a plan to get the platform
> in it will just cause trouble.
>
> What we can do is to say that it will be available also for
> CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST, so it gets built on the servers
> etc.
>
> depends on ARCH_MB86S7X || COMPILE_TEST
>
> But then you better test it a lot because then it will be
> compiled on X86_64 and such.
Whatever you do, I won't be bothering you again about this. Unless
ARCH_MB86S7X takes a long time to land, that is.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists