[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C233FB.3080309@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:43:55 +0100
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modsign: provide option to automatically delete the key
after modules were installed
Am 23.01.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Michal Marek:
> On 2015-01-23 11:15, Alexander Holler wrote:
>> Am 23.01.2015 um 10:39 schrieb Alexander Holler:
>>> Am 23.01.2015 um 10:24 schrieb Michal Marek:
>>>
>>>>> + @rm ./signing_key.priv
>>>>> + @rm ./signing_key.x509
>>>>
>>>> Why do you need to delete the certificate?
>>>
>>> No special reason.
>>>
>>> I'm just not sure (and too lazy to look it up) if it might contain the
>>> private key too (like it's possible in pem files), so I've deleted it too.
>>
>> Or in other words, while .priv leads me to the educated guess that it
>> contains the private key, .x509 doesn't give me an obvious indication
>> what it contains.
>>
>> If someone assures me that .x509 doesn't contain the private key
>> necessary to sign the modules, I'll send a v2 of the patch.
>
> The .x509 file contains a certificate signed by the private key, but not
> the private key. With some scripting, it can be used to verify the
> module signatures.
Assuming that doesn't change (hopefully), I'll send v2 in a few minutes
(it just compiles in order to test it). Thanks for assuring me that
.x509 does not and will not contain the private key.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists